Examining Factors Influencing the Integration of Blockchain Technology in the Freight Logistics Sector of Pakistan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55737/qjss.713554226Keywords:
Blockchain Adoption, Freight Logistics, Structural Equation Model, Technology Adoption, Logistic Professionals, Cultural DynamicsAbstract
This study examines the blockchain usage of Pakistan's freight logistics industry. A structural equation model is used to explore latent dimensions such as perceived ease of use, perceived usefulness, subjective norm, perceived behavioral control, attitude, and behavioral intention. To understand the specific factors impacting technology adoption decisions in this geographical and industrial location, a diverse sample of 245 Pakistan goods logistics sector operators will be explored. The findings reveal that perceived ease of use influences logistics professionals' behavioral intentions. The significance of clever and user-friendly interfaces emphasizes technology experiences that satisfy the expectations of Pakistani goods logistics workers. However, the perceived utility has a complicated relationship with behavioral intention, emphasizing the need for targeted actions to boost the perceived value of Blockchain technology in Pakistan's logistics business. Subjective norm is a major predictor of behavioral intention. This demonstrates how social and cultural factors influence Pakistani logistics workers' ambitions to use Blockchain. The correlation matrix and covariance analysis demonstrate that there are significant positive relationships between attitude, behavioral intention, perceived ease of use, perceived usefulness, and subjective norm. This detailed examination of the adoption environment offers practitioners, policymakers, and academics context-specific insights, setting the framework for informed freight logistics technology adoption and innovation activities in Pakistan.
Downloads
References
Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1975). A Bayesian analysis of attribution processes. Psychological Bulletin, 82(2), 261–277. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0076477
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-t
Ali, M. H., Chung, L., Kumar, A., Zailani, S., & Tan, K. H. (2021). A sustainable Blockchain framework for the halal food supply chain: Lessons from Malaysia. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 170, 120870. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120870
Bischoff, O., & Seuring, S. (2021). Opportunities and limitations of public blockchain-based supply chain traceability. Modern Supply Chain Research and Applications, 3(3), 226–243. https://doi.org/10.1108/mscra-07-2021-0014
Caldarelli, G., Rossignoli, C., & Zardini, A. (2020). Overcoming the blockchain Oracle problem in the traceability of non-fungible products. Sustainability, 12(6), 2391. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12062391
Cheng, E. W. L. (2018). Choosing between the theory of planned behavior (TPB) and the technology acceptance model (TAM). Educational Technology Research and Development, 67(1), 21–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-018-9598-6
Collart, A. J., & Canales, E. (2021). How might the broad adoption of blockchain‐based traceability impact the U.S. fresh produce supply chain? Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, 44(1), 219-236. https://doi.org/10.1002/aepp.13134
Dai, J., Chan, H. K., & Yee, R. W. (2018). Examining moderating effect of organizational culture on the relationship between market pressure and corporate environmental strategy. Industrial Marketing Management, 74, 227-236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2018.05.003
Dai, J., Montabon, F. L., & Cantor, D. E. (2014). Linking rival and stakeholder pressure to green supply management: Mediating role of top management support. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 71, 173-187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2014.09.002
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8), 982-1003. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982
Duan, J., Zhang, C., Gong, Y., Brown, S., & Li, Z. (2020). A content-analysis based literature review in blockchain adoption within food supply chain. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(5), 1784. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17051784
Hair, J. (2015). Essentials of Business Research Methods. New Delhi: Pearson Prentice Hall.
Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2-24. https://doi.org/10.1108/ebr-11-2018-0203
Härting, R., Sprengel, A., Wottle, K., & Rettenmaier, J. (2020). Potentials of blockchain technologies in supply chain management - A conceptual model. Procedia Computer Science, 176, 1950-1959. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2020.09.334
Hu, S., Huang, S., Huang, J., & Su, J. (2021). Blockchain and edge computing technology enabling organic agricultural supply chain: A framework solution to trust crisis. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 153, 107079. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2020.107079
Rocha, G. da S. R., de Oliveira, L., & Talamini, E. (2021). Blockchain Applications in Agribusiness: A Systematic Review. Future Internet, 13(4), 95. https://doi.org/10.3390/fi13040095
Seuring, S. A. (2008). Assessing the rigor of case study research in supply chain management. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 13(2), 128-137. https://doi.org/10.1108/13598540810860967
Wamba, S. F., & Queiroz, M. M. (2020). Blockchain in the operations and supply chain management: Benefits, challenges and future research opportunities. International Journal of Information Management, 52(2), 102064–110265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.102064
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Abdul SAMI
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
