The Role of Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) in Pakistan's Legal System
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55737/qjssh.733319300Keywords:
ADR, ODR, Arbitration, Mediation, DisputeAbstract
This article explores the transformative role of Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) in Pakistan's legal system, focusing on mediation, arbitration, and conciliation. ADR proves pivotal in addressing challenges like case backlog offering efficient and accessible dispute resolution. Its cost-effectiveness and participant-driven nature make it inclusive. ADR's adaptability fosters creative solutions, particularly in family and community disputes, emphasizing relationship preservation. Despite challenges, ongoing initiatives aim to enhance awareness and overcome cultural barriers. Looking ahead, ADR's promising future in Pakistan is marked by legislative reforms and growing cultural acceptance, heralding a shift towards a more collaborative and efficient legal landscape.
References
Ali, M., & Geng, L. L. (2019). Alternative dispute resolution (ADR) in Pakistan: The role of lawyers in mediation procedure. International Journal of Research, 6(04), 421-430. https://journals.pen2print.org/index.php/ijr/
Arbitration Act 1940 Pakistan.
Awais, H., & Munir, M. A. (2018, May). Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) in Trial Courts of Pakistan: A Practical Approach Towards New Era of Timely Justice as a Means of 'Justice for All'. In Report of 8th Judicial Conference, Law and Justice Commission of Pakistan (2018), Forthcoming.
Barrett, J. T., & Barrett, J. P. (2004). A history of alternative dispute resolution : the story of a political, cultural, and social movement. Jossey-Bass.
Chaturvedi, N. (2021). Alternate Dispute Resolution (ADR): Advantages & Disadvantages. Jus Corpus LJ, 2, 766.
Family Courts Act, 1964.
Gold, J. A. (2005). ADR through a cultural lens: How cultural values shape our disputing processes. Journal of Dispute Resolution, 2005(2), 1-33. https://scholarship.law.missouri.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=&httpsredir=1&article=1493&context=jdr
Goldberg, S. B., Green, E. D., & Sander, F. E. (1985). ADR problems and prospects: Looking to the future. Judicature, 69, 291. https://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/judica69&div=69&id=&page=
International Arbitration Act, 2017.
Kaya, S., & Khan, M. D. (2022). Online dispute resolution in Pakistan: Challenges and opportunities. Journal of Nusantara Studies (JONUS), 7(2), 103-119. https://doi.org/10.24200/jonus.vol7iss2pp103-119
Lee, C. K., Yiu, T. W., & Cheung, S. O. (2016). Selection and use of alternative dispute resolution (ADR) in construction projects — Past and future research. International Journal of Project Management, 34(3), 494-507. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2015.12.008
Menkel-Meadow, C. (1996). Introduction: What Will We Do When Adjudication Ends: A Brief Intellectual History of ADR. UCLA L. Rev., 44, 1613. https://scholarship.law.georgetown.edu/facpub/1765
Mnookin, R. H. (1998). Alternative dispute resolution (p. 2). Harvard Law School.
Punjab Alternative Dispute Resolution Act, 2019.
Recognition and Enforcement (Arbitration Agreements and Foreign Arbitral Awards) Act, 2011.
Roberts, S., & Palmer, M. (2005). Dispute processes: ADR and the primary forms of decision-making. Cambridge University Press.
Shah, A. (2004). Using ADR to resolve online disputes. Richmond Journal of Law & Technology, 10(3), 25. https://scholarship.richmond.edu/jolt/vol10/iss3/3
Sindh Alternative Dispute Resolution Act, 2017.
Stipanowich, T. J. (2004). ADR and the “Vanishing trial”: The growth and impact of “Alternative dispute resolution”. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 1(3), 843-912. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-1461.2004.00025.x
Won, S. K. (2013). Overview of alternate dispute resolution with special reference to arbitration laws in Pakistan. Journal of Arbitration Studies, 23(3), 149-167. https://doi.org/10.16998/jas.2013.23.3.149
