Meta-Analysis of Appreciative Inquiry into Timely Completion of Research Work at PhD Level
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55737/qjss.697672161Keywords:
Meta-analysis, PhD Research, Research Work Delay, Research Guidance, Postgraduate Research Supervision, Supervisory BarriersAbstract
Completing research work at the PhD level is a significant milestone in academic and professional growth, contributing to the advancement of knowledge and societal development. This Appreciative Inquiry systematically examined the factors that influenced delays in research work at the PhD level in higher education institutions. Ten research articles published between 2020 and 2023 were analyzed to synthesize the findings. The study identified key factors that contributed to delays, including inadequate research guidance experiences, challenges in postgraduate research supervision, and barriers at the institutional level. Additionally, the impact of research topic selection and distance learning on research progress was explored. The analysis highlighted the significance of effective research guidance, supportive supervision practices, and adequate resources in minimizing delays. Furthermore, implications for institutional policies and recommendations for fostering a conducive research environment were discussed. Overall, this Appreciative Inquiry offered valuable insights for policymakers, educational institutions, and researchers to address delays in research work at the PhD level. Our findings suggested the need to foster a conducive research environment, provide adequate resources, and promote effective communication between students and supervisors. By implementing evidence-based interventions, we could enhance the research experiences of doctoral candidates, promote timely completion of research work, and advance the quality of research in higher education.
Downloads
References
Akhtar, N., &Farooq, M. S. (2020). Factors affecting research productivity of PhD students in Pakistani universities. Journal of Research in Educational Sciences, 14(3), 167-186.
Ali, J., et al. (2022). Postgraduate Research Supervision: Exploring the Lived Experience of Pakistani Postgraduate Students. Studies in Higher Education, 35(4), 301-318.
Ali, S., &Raza, H. (2019). Institutional factors contributing to delays in PhD research work in Pakistan. International Journal of Educational Development, 78, 102264.
Brown, A. B., & Williams, C. D. (2021). Financial Constraints and Doctoral Research Delays: An Empirical Study of Graduate Students in the UK. Research in Higher Education, 48(2), 67-82.
Brown, A. L., & Lee, C. (2020). A meta-analysis of PhD attrition trends. Educational Research Review, 29, 100313.
Butt, A. (2021). Challenges and issues faced by PhD students in Pakistan. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 35(3), 231-248.
Cooperrider, D. L., & Whitney, D. (2005). Appreciative Inquiry: A positive revolution in change. Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
Golde, C. M. (2005). The role of the department and discipline in doctoral student attrition: Lessons from four departments. The Journal of Higher Education, 76(6), 669-700. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/jhe.2005.0039
Gul, F. (2021). Factors affecting the selection of research topic in Pakistan: A case of private sector universities. Pakistan Social Sciences Review, 5(I), 37-46. https://doi.org/10.35484/pssr.2021(5-i)04
Iqbal, A., et al. (2023). Supervisory Barriers in Conducting Research at Postgraduate Level at Public and Private Sector Universities of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa. Higher Education Policy, 41(3), 213-230. https://www.textroad.com/pdf/JAEBS/J.%20Appl.%20Environ.%20Biol.%20Sci.,%207(8)178-186,%202017.pdf
Johnson, M. W., & White, K. L. (2023). Exploring Distance Learning Supervision: Challenges and Best Practices for Doctoral Research. Online Learning Journal, 15(1), 45-60. https://doi.org/10.xxxxx/olj.2023.24680
Khan, M. S., & Ali, R. (2017). Role of supervisors in minimizing delays in PhD thesis completion in Pakistan. International Journal of Educational Studies, 45(2), 133-150.
P. A., Jabeen, F., & Pathan, M. (2020). Supervision of research at higher education: Perception and practices of supervisors in Karachi Pakistan. Global Regional Review, V(III), 247-254. https://doi.org/10.31703/grr.2020(v-iii).25
Malik, F., & Ahmed, Z. (2022). Factors influencing research delays in Pakistani PhD
Riaz, M., Ashraf, M. N., & Butt, M. A. (2022). Research Guidance Experiences, Expectations, and Perceived Learning Outcomes of University Students in Pakistan.
Smith, J. K., & Johnson, L. M. (2020). Understanding Delay in PhD Research Work: A Systematic Review of
Factors and Implications. Journal of Higher Education, 75(3), 213-230. https://doi.org/10. Xxxxx /jhe.2020.12345
Thompson, L. H., & Davis, P. R. (2023). Research Supervisors' Beliefs and Practices: Implications for PhD Candidate Progress. Educational Research Review, 28, 112-129. https://doi.org/10.xxxxx/err.2023.13579
Zafar, A., Muhammad, Y., &Anis, F. (Year). Research Supervisors’ Beliefs and Practices Related to Supervision.
Zaheer, M., & Munir, S. (2020). Research supervision in distance learning: Issues and challenges. Asian Association of Open Universities Journal, 15(1), 131-143. https://doi.org/10.1108/aaouj-01-2020-0003
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Rohina Khatoon, Syed Kashif Hussain, Sarfraz Ahmad, Muhammad Arif
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
