Development and Validation of the Adolescent Triangulation Scale
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55737/qjssh.441594056Keywords:
Triangulation, Pushed out, Pulled in, Mediator, Balanced, AdolescentsAbstract
Triangulation is conceptualized as the involvement of a third person in a dyadic relationship in order to balance excessive conflicts, intimacy, and distance and provide stability within the system. A self-report scale to measure adolescents' triangulation into inter-parental conflicts was developed, and psychometric properties of the scale were established. The study was conducted in a three-phase format. Data was collected from adolescents (10-19 years) of different schools and colleges in Pakistan. In Phase I, items were generated through a literature review and focused group discussion. In Phase II, four latent factors (Pushed out, pulled in, mediator, balanced) were extracted through EFA (N=493). Phase III comprised a test of dimensionality, reliability, and validity. The dimensionality of the Adolescent Triangulation Scale was established through CFA (N=494). Reliability of the scale was established through Cronbach alpha (α= .87-.90) and composite reliability (CR= .88-.92). Furthermore, the validity of the scale was assessed through Average Variance Extracted (AVE= .55-.69), Maximum Variance Shared (MVS= .88-.93), Fornell and Lacker criterion and Hetro-trait-Mono-trait Criterion. Results showed that the Adolescent Triangulation Scale appears to have good psychometric properties and contributes to the literature on family systems theory by allowing for a more nuanced measurement of triangulation than was previously available.
References
Amato, P. R., & Afifi, T. D. (2006). Feeling caught between parents: Adult children's relations with parents and subjective well‐being. Journal of Marriage and Family, 68(1), 222-235. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2006.00243.x
Bell, L. G., Bell, D. C., & Nakata, Y. (2001). Triangulation and adolescent development in the U.S. and Japan*. Family Process, 40(2), 173-186. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1545-5300.2001.4020100173.x
Bentler, P. M. (2007). On tests and indices for evaluating structural models. Personality and Individual Differences, 42(5), 825-829. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2006.09.024
Boateng, G. O., Neilands, T. B., Frongillo, E. A., Melgar-Quiñonez, H. R., & Young, S. L. (2018). Best practices for developing and validating scales for health, social, and behavioral research: A primer. Frontiers in Public Health, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2018.00149
Bradford, K., Spuhler, B., Higginbotham, B. J., Laxman, D., & Morgan, C. N. (2019). “I don't want to make the same mistakes”: Relationship education among low‐income single adults. Family Relations, 68(4), 405-419. https://doi.org/10.1111/fare.12379
Bresin, R. C., Murdock, N. L., Marszalek, J. M., & Stapley, L. A. (2017). The triangular relationship inventory: Development and validation. Couple and Family Psychology: Research and Practice, 6(4), 287-310. https://doi.org/10.1037/cfp0000094
Buehler, C., & Welsh, D. P. (2009). A process model of adolescents' triangulation into parents' marital conflict: The role of emotional reactivity. Journal of Family Psychology, 23(2), 167-180. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014976
Buehler, C., Franck, K. L., & Cook, E. C. (2009). Adolescents' triangulation in marital conflict and peer relations. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 19(4), 669-689. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-7795.2009.00616.x
Clark, L. A., & Watson, D. (n.d.). Constructing validity: Basic issues in objective scale development. Methodological issues and strategies in clinical research (4th ed.), 187-203. https://doi.org/10.1037/14805-012
Davies, P. T., & Forman, E. M. (2002). Children's patterns of preserving emotional security in the interparental subsystem. Child Development, 73(6), 1880-1903. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.t01-1-00512
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(3), 382. https://doi.org/10.2307/3150980
Franck, K. L., & Buehler, C. (2007). A family process model of marital hostility, parental depressive affect, and early adolescent problem behavior: The roles of triangulation and parental warmth. Journal of Family Psychology, 21(4), 614-625. https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-3200.21.4.614
Franck, K. L., & Buehler, C. (2007). A family process model of marital hostility, parental depressive affect, and early adolescent problem behavior: The roles of triangulation and parental warmth. Journal of Family Psychology, 21(4), 614-625. https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-3200.21.4.614
Gavazzi, S. M., & Lim, J. (2023). Family systems theory. Families with Adolescents, 35-45. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-43407-5_4
Grych, J. H., Raynor, S. R., &Fosco, G. M. (2004). Family processes that shape the impact of interparental conflict on adolescents. Development and psychopathology, 16(3), 649-665. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0954579404004717
Grych, J. H., Seid, M., & Fincham, F. D. (1992). Assessing marital conflict from the child's perspective: The Children's Perception of Interparental Conflict Scale. Child development, 63(3), 558-572. https://doi.org/10.2307/1131346
Hair Jr., J. F., Gabriel, M. L., & Patel, V. K. (2014). Modelagem de Equações Estruturais Baseada Em Covariância (CB-SEM) com o AMOS: Orientações sobre a sua aplicação Como Uma Ferramenta de Pesquisa de marketing. Revista Brasileira de Marketing, 13(2), 44-55. https://doi.org/10.5585/remark.v13i2.2718 ]
HALEY, J. (1967). Speech sequences of normal and abnormal families with two children present. Family Process, 6(1), 81-97. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1545-5300.1967.00081.x
Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2012). Using partial least squares path modeling in advertising research: Basic concepts and recent issues. Handbook of Research on International Advertising. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781781001042.00023
Hulland, J. (1999). Use of partial least squares (PLS) in strategic management research: A review of four recent studies. Strategic Management Journal, 20(2), 195-204. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1097-0266(199902)20:2<195::aid-smj13>3.0.co;2-7
Kerr, M. E., Bowen, M., & Kerr, M. E. (1988). Family evaluation. WW Norton & Company.
Klever, P. (2008). The primary triangle and variation in nuclear family functioning. Contemporary Family Therapy, 31(2), 140-159. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10591-008-9082-2
Krosnick, J., & Presser, S. (2009). Question and questionnaire design in JD Wright & PV Marsden (Eds.). Handbook of Survey Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54395-6_53
LAWSHE, C. H. (1975). A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel Psychology, 28(4), 563-575. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1975.tb01393.x
Margolin, G., Gordis, E. B., & John, R. S. (2001). Coparenting: A link between marital conflict and parenting in two-parent families. Journal of Family Psychology, 15(1), 3-21. https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-3200.15.1.3
Minuchin, P. (1985). Families and individual development: Provocations from the Field of family therapy. Child Development, 56(2), 289-302. https://doi.org/10.2307/1129720
Perosa, L., Hansen, J., &Perosa, S. (1981). Development of the structural family interaction scale. Family Therapy, 8(2), 77.
Pett, M. A., Lackey, N. R., & Sullivan, J. J. (2003). Making sense of factor analysis: The use of factor analysis for instrument development in health care research. sage.
Satir, V. & Baldwin, M. (1983). Satir step by step: A guide to creating change in families. Palo Alto, CA: Science and Behavior Books.
Shelton, K. H., & Harold, G. T. (2008). Interparental conflict, negative parenting, and children's adjustment: Bridging links between parents' depression and children's psychological distress. Journal of Family Psychology, 22(5), 712-724. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013515
Titelman, P. (2012). Triangles: Bowen family systems theory perspectives. Routledge.
Titelman, P. (2014). Clinical applications of Bowen family systems theory. Routledge.
Vetere, A., &Dallos, R. (2018). Working systemically with families: Formulation, intervention and evaluation. Routledge.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Nida Riaz, Nazia Iqbal, Bushra Hassan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
