Life of Communication Process: A Critical and Philosophical Approach Study of Communication Process

Authors

  • Zarnab Noor Tariq MS Scholar, Riphah International University, Rawalpindi, Punjab, Pakistan.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55737/qjssh.498899116

Keywords:

Communication Process, Philosophical Developments, Ontology, Self-awareness

Abstract

Contextualizing Life of Communication is the study conducted to interpret the philosophical developments respective to critical approaches of Communication as a discipline, Communication as an idea, Communication as a process and Communication as a phenomenon, which results in the formulation of seven major traditions of Communication. This Research is an effort to identify the ontological existence and perspective of Communication, acclaiming it as a condition and state of mind in which we live all the Time consciously and unknowingly. The Research is an attempt to identify the importance of thinking, analyzing and understanding Imagination and self-awareness in the context of Communication. The methodological practice followed in this Research is Habermas's Public sphere theory, along with dialectal hermeneutical analysis through constructivism theory. The Research concluded that Imagination keeps Communication alive till it fulfils the purpose of its existence, and self-awareness is that purpose which needs to be attained through the precondition of thoughts (imaginations). For the sake of conclusion, a prospecting model derived from interpretations of various philosophers and Allama Iqbal’s Model of Life is presented in this Research.

References

Byrne, R. (2008). The Rational Imagination: How People Create Alternatives to Reality. The Behavioral and brain sciences. 30, 439-53, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X07002579

Cleland, C. E., & Chyba, C. F. (2002). Defining ‘Life’. Orig Life Evol Biosph 32, 387–393. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020503324273

David, E. (2002). The communicative Imagination and its cultivation, Communication Quarterly, 50(1), 41-57. https://doi.org/101080/01463370209385645

De Luca, L. (2017). Imagination in the rational classroom: Considering alternatives to capitalism. The Journal of School & Society, 4(2), 78–83.

Demeter, M., & Tóth, J. (2012). Basic Researches In Communication and Media Studies. Kome, 1(1), 1-4. https://doi.org/10.17646/kome.2012.11

Durant, W. (2009). The story of philosophy: The lives and opinions of the great philosophers of the Western world. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.

Flusser, V. (1992). Bodenlos: eine philosophische Autobiographie [Rootless: A philosophical autobiography], Bensheim and Düsseldorf, Germany: Bollmann.

Gehrke, P. J., & Keith, W. M. (2014). A Century of Communication Studies: The Unfinished Conversation (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203366912

Gerson, L. (2014, July 2). The Hermeneutics of Mystery in Plato. Academia.edu. https://www.academia.edu/7531441/The_Hermeneutics_of_Mystery_in_Plato

Grace, H. A. (1956). Confidence, Redundancy, and the Purpose of Communication. Journal of Communication, 6(1), 16-23. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1956.tb02460

Holcombe, A. N. (1922). Public Opinion. By Walter Lippmann. (New York: Harcourt, Brace and Company. 1922. Pp. x, 427.). American Political Science Review. 16(3), 500-501. https://doi.org/10.2307/1943740

Hussain, M. (2020). The Impact of Effective Communication on Organizational Performance with Moderating Role of Organizational Culture. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.22101.35048

Iqbal, M. (1930). The Reconstruction of Religious Thought in Islam. The Reconstruction of Religious Thought in Islam. https://www.sup.org/books/title/?id=21804

Kant, I., Critique of Pure Reason, P., Guyer & Wood, A. (1997). (trans.), Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press,

Kecskes, I. (2010). The paradox of Communication: Socio-cognitive approach to pragmatics. Pragmatics and Society, 1(1), 50-73. https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.1.1.04kec

Marcia á Cavalcante Schuback, M. (2006). The knowledge of attention. International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-Being, 1(3), 133–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/17482620600884049

Novak- Marcincin, J., Gîfu, D., & Nicolescu, A. (2014). The Standard of Axes in Ontology of Communication. International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences, 41, 176–183. https://doi.org/10.18052/www.scipress.com/ilshs.41.176

Robbins, B. (2014, April 22). Joyful thinking-thanking: A reading of Heidegger’s “What is called thinking?” Academia.edu. https://www.academia.edu/2181567/Joyful_Thinking_Thanking_A_Reading_of_Heidegger_s_What_Is_Called_Thinking_

Rust, J. (2009). John Searle (continuum contemporary American thinkers). Continuum International Publishing Group Ltd.

Schiffer, M. B., & Miller, A. (1999). The Material Life of Human Beings: Artifacts, Behavior, and Communication, Routledge, London.

Shafe, O. (2021). The Classical Period (Plato And Aristotle) Presenter: Shafe Oluwagbenga Solomon (Sociology Of Education).

Shapiro, M. (2007). Values, Creativity, and Imagination in Generalizability. Communication Methods and Measures. 1, 207-213. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312450701434995

Spronck, S. (2016). The Instruction of Imagination: Language as a Social Communication Technology. Australian Journal of Linguistics, 39(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1080/07268602.2016.1255121

Strawson, G. (2017). ‘We live beyond…any tale that we happen to enact’. The Subject of Experience, 106-122. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198777885.003.0006

The Mind's Eye. (n.d.). https://iai.tv/video/the-mind-s-eye

Tomkins, L., & Eatough, V. (2018). Hermeneutics: interpretation, understanding and sense-making.

Vardoulakis, D. (1970, January 1). Dimitris Vardoulakis, total Imagination and ontology in R. G. Collingwood. PhilArchive. https://philarchive.org/rec/VARTIA

Vlăduţescu, Ş., & Ciupercă, M. E. (2014). Next Flood Level of Communication Social Networks.

Vygotskiĭ, L. S. (1962). Thought and language. Cambridge: M.I.T. Press, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

Walters, J. A. (1922, January 1). The purpose of life : Walters, James A, Archive. https://archive.org/details/purposeoflife00walt

Wilson, D., & Sperber, D. (2012). Meaning and relevance. Cambridge Core. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/meaning-and-relevance/500D9D857CB3274BD23AF6FB381133B7

Published

2023-12-30

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Tariq, Z. N. (2023). Life of Communication Process: A Critical and Philosophical Approach Study of Communication Process. Qlantic Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 4(4), 297-309. https://doi.org/10.55737/qjssh.498899116

Similar Articles

1-10 of 43

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.