Democracy, Economic Development, and the Separation of Powers in the 1973 Constitution Pakistan: A Critical Analysis

Authors

  • Syed Raza Shah Gilani Assistant Professor, Department of Law, Abdul Wali Khan University Mardan, KP, Pakistan.
  • Zahid Ullah Lecturer, Department of Political Science, Abdul Wali Khan University Mardan, KP, Pakistan.
  • Shehla Zahoor Assistant Professor, Department of Law, Shaheed Benazir Bhutto Women University, Peshawar, KP, Pakistan.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55737/qjssh.401499812

Keywords:

1973 Constitution, Separation of Powers, Democracy, Economic Development, Political Parties

Abstract

This article examines the links between democracy, economic development, and the separation of powers-with a focus on the 1973 Constitution of Pakistan. Under the 1973 Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, there is a separation between the judicial, legislative, and executive organs of the state, yet there is evidence that the separation exists more on paper and less in reality. The interference of one institution in another’s functions is not only constitutionally unwarranted but is also against the essence of democracy. The prime minister of Pakistan is allowed by the constitution to exercise all executive powers in the name of the president and to oversee legislation in the country. Due to political party discipline, legislative assembly members cannot delay any legislation proposed by their party leader. It shows there is a close link between the executive and the legislature that seemingly goes against the theory and practice of the strict separation of powers. The judicial history of Pakistan shows the paramountcy of the executive over the judiciary. Nevertheless, the judiciary, through judicial activism, including judicial review and suo moto measures of the Supreme Court, has also affected the distribution of powers between the executive, legislature, and judiciary in Pakistan.

References

Asad, M. (2022, April 8). History of Supreme Interventions in Constitutional Crises. Dawn. https://www.dawn.com/news/1683982

Bazmi, S., & Qureshi, A. (2021). Separation of Powers: Prerequisite for a Stable Democracy. Pakistan Journal of Social Sciences, 41(4), 875-885. http://pjss.bzu.edu.pk/index.php/pjss/article/view/1041

Boucher, D., & Kelly, P. (2009). Political Thinkers: from Socrates to the Present. New York: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/hepl/9780198708926.001.0001

Cameron, M. A., & Falleti, T. G. (2005). Federalism and the Subnational Separation of Powers. Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 35(2), 245–271. https://doi.org/10.1093/publius/pji012 Carolan, E. (2009). The new separation of powers: a theory for the modern state. OUP Oxford.

Cohler, A. M., Miller, B. C., & Stone, H. S. (1989). Montesquieu: The spirit of the laws. Cambridge University Press.

Craig, P. (2017). Formal and substantive conceptions of the rule of law: an analytical framework. In The Rule of Law and the Separation of Powers (pp. 95-115). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315085302-4

Gilani, S. R. S. (2019). The significance of the doctrine of proportionality in the context of militant democracy to protect the freedom of expression Brunel University London.

Gilani, S. R. S., Ali, M. A., & Zahoor, M. S. (2023). Limitations on Parliamentary Sovereignty in the UK: A Critical Analysis. Journal of European Studies (JES), 39(1), 47. https://doi.org/10.56384/jes.v39i1.288

Gilani, S. R. S., Khan, I., & Zahoor, S. (2021). The Historical Origins of the Proportionality Doctrine as a tool of Judicial Review: A Critical Analysis. Research Journal of Social Sciences and Economics Review, 2(1), 251-258. https://doi.org/10.36902/rjsser-vol2-iss1-2021(251-258)

Gilani, S. R. S., Rehman, H. U., & Khan, I. (2021). The Conceptual Analysis of the Doctrine of Proportionality and, its Role in Democratic Constitutionalism; A Case Study of UK. sjesr, 4(1), 204-210. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:237300915

Gilani, S. R. S., ur Rehman, H., & Mujtaba, B. G. (2014). Islam, Shari'a Laws and International Human Rights Compatibility for Expatriate Business Managers. Journal of Business Studies Quarterly, 6(2), 98. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:156526746

Gilani, S. R. S., Zahoor, S., & Iqbal, M. A. (2022). Child Labor in Pakistan: Causes, Consequences and Prevention. Pakistan Social Sciences Review, 6(2), 197-208. https://ojs.pssr.org.pk/journal/article/view/127

Grebnev, R. (2016). Judicial Power in the Structure of the State Mechanism and in the Separation of Powers. The Social Sciences (Pakistan), 11(22), 5309-5313. https://10.36478/sscience.2016.5309.5313

Khan, M. I. U. (2016). Separation of Powers and its impacts on Peoples Empowerment A Case Study of Pakistan (2007-2013) Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan].

Khan, M. I., & Muhammad, A. (2020). An Evaluation of Separation of Powers: A Case Study of Pakistan (2007-2013). South Asian Studies, 31(1), 257 – 274. http://pu.edu.pk/images/journal/csas/PDF/17%20Ikram%20ulla_v31_no1_jan-jun2016.pdf

Kurland, P. (1986). The Rise and Fall of the “Doctrine” of Separation of Powers. Michigan Law Review, 85(3), 592–614. https://repository.law.umich.edu/mlr/vol85/iss3/12

Levi, E. H. (1976). Some Aspects of Separation of Powers. Columbia Law Review, 76(3), 371. https://doi.org/10.2307/1121549

Magill, M. E. (2000). The Real Separation in Separation of Powers Law. Virginia Law Review, 86(6), 1127. https://doi.org/10.2307/1073943

Mahmood, D. Z., & Chawala, P. D. M. I. (2021). Theory of Separation of Power: Balancing the CivilMilitary Relations in Pakistan 2013-2018. South Asian Studies, 1(35), http://journals.pu.edu.pk/journals/index.php/IJSAS/article/view/4109

Manning, J. F. (2010). Separation of powers as ordinary interpretation. Harv. L. Rev., 124, 1939. https://harvardlawreview.org/print/vol-124/separation-of-powers-as-ordinary-interpretation/

Shah Gilani, S. R., Ullah, Z., & Zahoor, S. (2022). Notions of Freedom of Expression and Religion in contemporary world: A Critical Analysis. Journal of Religious Studies (UOCHJRS), 5(2), https://doi.org/10.33195/journal.v5iII.459

Shah Gilani, S. R., Ur Rehman, H., & Khan, A. S. (2021). Contextual Analyses of" The Doctrine of a Margin of Appreciation" in the Frameworks of the European Court of Human Rights and the British Legal System. Journal of European Studies (02589680), 37(1), 1-14.

Siddiqi, F. (2013, January 20). The Judiciary & Military. Dawn.

Soomro, K. H., & Masudi, J. A. (2023). Separation of Powers and Role of Judicial Activism in Pakistan. Propel Journal of Academic Research, 3(1), 144-156. https://doi.org/10.55464/pjar.v3i1.68

Welford, R. (2002). Globalization, corporate social responsibility and human rights. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 9(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.4

Published

2023-09-30

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Gilani, S. R. S., Ullah, Z., & Zahoor, S. (2023). Democracy, Economic Development, and the Separation of Powers in the 1973 Constitution Pakistan: A Critical Analysis. Qlantic Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 4(3), 150-158. https://doi.org/10.55737/qjssh.401499812

Similar Articles

21-30 of 84

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.